But it took some work to convince managers, CIOs, and CEOs, who typically watch slick demos, that a command-line tool was better than all of these bells and whistles with PaaS.
![learning red hat enterprise linux learning red hat enterprise linux](http://images.sftcdn.net/images/t_optimized,f_auto/p/cb9c4224-a4d1-11e6-9b5a-00163ed833e7/1408252114/fedora-linux-screenshot.png)
Operations teams quickly understood, and Silicon Valley investors understood. Furthermore, the ecosystem that has evolved around containers-including the seemingly indefectible Kubernetes orchestration platform-has enabled organizations to effectively scale and manage growing container collections.ĭevelopers quickly understood the value of containers.
![learning red hat enterprise linux learning red hat enterprise linux](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/o3FyqaX6kA0/maxresdefault.jpg)
They worked, and they continue to work, across highly distributed architectures and within the devops and CI/CD ( continuous integration and continuous delivery) models that are required today to meet new and constant customer demands for improvements without regressions (aka bugs, security problems, etc.).Ĭontainers enable developers to change applications quickly, without breaking the functionality users rely on.
![learning red hat enterprise linux learning red hat enterprise linux](https://www.crn.com/resources/0251-0c79caef382b-7802fc2a2f1b-1000/rhel-linux-8.jpg)
In fact, I’d argue that the Docker CLI in particular showed the world that when we bring a modern sense of UX to the development of a CLI, it can change the world.ĭocker-and containers in general-provided the underlying technology for developing cloud-native applications. But the Docker command-line interface (CLI) was really elegant. It actually leveraged a UX first made popular in the 1970s in Unix! Docker was just a command run in a Linux terminal-a far cry from the slick graphical interfaces on most PaaS platforms. That’s not to say that Docker was pretty. With Docker you could quickly and easily fire up a pre-built service, but you could also easily develop locally, and customize services to make them do what you need. In fact, when Docker came out, its value was staggeringly obvious: All the things that were hard on Heroku were easy with Docker, and all the things that were easy on Heroku were also easy with Docker. The Docker differenceĬontainers, on the other hand, solved many of the challenges with PaaS, and Docker was the company that made developers, IT managers, and business managers see and understand that. But in typical IT fashion, lots of people went all in before realizing that platforms like Heroku have their place but are not the right tool for every job. As soon as your team built something more complex than a simple web app, or they needed to customize the infrastructure for security or performance reasons, it became a difficult, very “real” engineering problem. In addition, although the Heroku model was extremely powerful if you used what was provided out of the box, it was complex behind the scenes. If a developer wanted to work on their local box, they were still left to manually build the environment themselves. Unlike Netflix, it turns out, developers love to develop locally. Developers had to work remotely on the PaaS platform if they wanted to collaborate.
LEARNING RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX PORTABLE
For example, applications built on Heroku were not portable they were available only within Heroku. You just go out to this portal and develop your apps and deliver them as a service? What’s not to like? Why wouldn’t you develop apps on Heroku?Īs it turned out, there were a couple of good reasons not to use Heroku and PaaS platforms of its ilk. So much so that it looked like PaaS was going to take over the world.Īt that time, Heroku was huge. In fact, PaaS in general and Heroku specifically became wildly popular.
![learning red hat enterprise linux learning red hat enterprise linux](https://assets.exitcertified.com/assets/CourseCategoryHeaderImages/821d00fa69/red-hat-logo-white-2019__ScaleMaxWidthWzMyNF0.png)
LEARNING RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX SOFTWARE
People were hungry for the next innovation in IT and software development. The marketing machine was tired of virtualization. Most organizations had already garnered the benefits of virtualization or had a roadmap to get there. Looking for the Next Big Thingīy 2009, the value of using virtualization was well understood and it was widely deployed. But to really understand Docker’s impact, it’s important to go back to a time slightly before Docker container technology made its debut. The fact that the Docker command line tool displaced years of sexy web interfaces is perhaps a commentary on what developers really want. With Docker, developers could really and truly build software once and run it locally, or on a production server. There’s been a vocal reaction to this announcement, one that reminds me of the important role Docker played in popularizing a model we know, love, and now use on a mainstream basis: containers.ĭocker did not invent containers, but it made the technology accessible through an open source tool and reusable images. Now, the company is back in the press with the introduction of a new model for Docker Desktop that requires larger organizations to buy a paid subscription for the tools. Docker made headlines for the critical role it played in bringing containers to the mainstream, and in many ways displaced PaaS as the hotness of the time ( Heroku anyone?).